Now here is a great piece of news: Simon Singh’s appeal successful
This is great news. Truly important for science that robust debate and analytic, evidence-based peer-review be allowed as part of public discourse.
***To get in touch with me use Reply-To Address: firstname.lastname@example.org***
A very quick note to make sure you heard that Simon Singh’s appeal in his case with the BCA was upheld today. It means that Simon can now defend his article as comment rather than as fact, as Justice Eady had originally ruled.
Simon said today: “It is ridiculous that it has cost £200,000 to establish the meaning of a handful of words. I am delighted that my meaning has been vindicated by three of the most powerful judges in the country, and I relish the opportunity to defend this meaning in court. However, I am still angry that libel is so horrendously expensive. That is just one of the reasons why the battle for libel reform must continue.”
You can read more comments from campaigners and supporters at www.libelreform.org/news/450-judgement-in-simon-singh-libel-case
And the judgment and Simon’s lawyer’s notes on what this means for Simon’s case and for libel reform is here: http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk/index.php/site/project/473/
Jack of Kent has blogged on the ruling here: http://jackofkent.blogspot.com/
BBC Radio 4 World at One http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00rlff7
BBC online http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8598472.stm
And check here for updated lists of press coverage: www.senseaboutscience.org.uk/index.php/site/project/473/
Keep an eye out for Simon, his lawyer Robert Dougans and members of the libel reform campaign on Channel 4 news, the BBC News channel, Sky News and BBC radio stations this evening.
Simon, and the campaign for libel reform, both still have a very long fight ahead of us. We are very pleased the three most powerful members of the Judiciary in England have recognised the need for libel law reform. We need to make sure everyone else does too.
Sense About Science
25 Shaftesbury Avenue
London W1D 7EG
Reg. Charity No. 1101114
Tel: +44 (0)20 7478 4380
Sense About Science is a small charity that equips people to make sense of science and evidence. We depend on donations, large and small, from people who support our work. You can donate, or find out more, at www.senseaboutscience.org/donate
And from Jack of Kent:
Simon Singh today won in the Court of Appeal.
The Court of Appeal held he was expressing “honest opinion”.
It is a stunning judgment, quoting Milton and expressly adopting a US legal maxim that: “Scientific controversies must be settled by the methods of science rather than by the methods of litigation“.
You can read the judgment in full here.
And so the British Chiropractic Association – which happily promotes bogus treatments even though there is not a jot of evidence – lost.
The BCA – discredited since the plethora – has announced that it is “disappointed” and that it is “considering its position” in respect of what has always been a staggeringly misconceived libel claim.
The judgment is packed with interesting things and will repay careful study.